Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Top latest Five case laws for the bail of section 506 ppc Urban news
Blog Article
Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, and case regulation at both the federal and state levels.
The main objectives of police is usually to apprehend offenders, examine crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and previously mentioned all make certain legislation and order to protect citizen???s life and property. Read more
Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI 46 SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the acquired counsel for your parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard towards the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession from the subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided through the competent court after hearing the parties if pending given that the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this facet for interim custody of the topic premises In case the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The plenty of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made very clear that police is free to acquire action against any person who is indulged in criminal activities subject matter to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-industry duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), clearly distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a transfer to a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, about the other hand, supplies financial relief by putting an employee in a very higher spend scale, without transforming their task duties or position. It is a system designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained inside the same fork out scale for a lengthy time, particularly when they deficiency possibilities for promotion. Upgradation can be a policy Software used to ease the hardship of long-term stagnation. Read more
The proposal appears to be reasonable and acceded to. While in the meantime police shall remain neutral during the private dispute between the parties, however, if any from the individuals is indulged in criminal activity the police shall take prompt action against them under legislation. five. The moment petition is disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court will be the highest court in the United States. Decreased courts within the federal level contain the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, and the U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts hear cases involving matters related to the United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that involve parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each state has its own judicial system that includes trial and appellate courts. The highest court in Every single state is often referred to as being the “supreme” court, Even though there are a few exceptions to this rule, for example, the The big apple Court of Appeals or the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Despite the fact that state courts may also generally hear cases involving federal laws.
168 . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it really is practical to get a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to eliminate a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it's got attained to some stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for benefit disposal when it's got attained these types of stage. Read more
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, because they were all acting in their Work with DCFS.
500,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Every along with the same shall be held within the police station into the effect that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. 5. In view of the above mentioned, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more
182 here . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account from the allegations leveled against the petitioner, inside our view, section 20 of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does supply for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension may very well be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension might be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions set via the government.
Any court might request to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this kind of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to your higher court.
If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the opportunity to review both the precedent along with the case under appeal, Possibly overruling the previous case law by setting a whole new precedent of higher authority. This may well occur several times as being the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first of your High Court of Justice, later with the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement on the concept of estoppel starting inside the High Trees case.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to your main case, It's also a perfectly-set up proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary receive support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.